nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 03, v.41 235-241
MRI DTI参数与单侧神经根受压腰椎间盘突出症患者疼痛及非手术治疗效果的关系
基金项目(Foundation): 河南省高等学校重点科研项目计划(23A430040)
邮箱(Email): Zifang701@126.com;
DOI:
摘要:

目的 研究MRI扩散张量成像(Diffusion tensor imaging,DTI)参数与单侧神经根受压腰椎间盘突出症患者疼痛及非手术治疗效果的关系。方法 回顾性分析自2021-08—2024-05采用非手术治疗的364例单侧神经根受压腰椎间盘突出症,根据患者神经根疼痛程度分为轻度疼痛组(109例)、中度疼痛组(201例)、重度疼痛组(54例),根据疗效分为疗效欠佳组(73例)、疗效良好组(291例)。采用多因素Logistic回归分析单侧神经根受压腰椎间盘突出症患者非手术治疗效果的影响因素,采用Pearson相关系数分析MRI参数与患者疼痛的相关性,采用受试者工作特征曲线分析MRI参数对患者非手术治疗效果的预测价值。结果 轻度疼痛组、中度疼痛组、重度疼痛组正常侧与受压侧腰大肌横截面面积差值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而3组间两侧多裂肌横截面面积差值和受压侧髓核区T2值、纤维环区T2值、FA值、ADC值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。单侧神经根受压腰椎间盘突出症患者受压侧神经根疼痛VAS评分与髓核区T2值、纤维环区T2值、FA值呈负相关,ADC值与疼痛VAS评分呈正相关。Lee 4区、椎间盘退行性改变程度为Ⅳ级、合并Ⅰ度腰椎滑脱、合并纤维环破裂、髓核区T2值较低、纤维环区T2值较低、FA值较低、ADC值较高均为单侧神经根受压腰椎间盘突出症患者非手术治疗效果欠佳的危险因素(P<0.05)。受试者工作特征曲线分析结果显示髓核区T2值、纤维环区T2值、FA值、ADC值联合预测单侧神经根受压腰椎间盘突出症患者非手术治疗效果的曲线下面积大于四者单独检测。结论 单侧神经根受压腰椎间盘突出症患者的MRI参数中髓核区T2值、纤维环区T2值、FA值、ADC值出现变化,而且变化水平与受压侧神经根疼痛明显相关;此类患者非手术疗效欠佳的危险因素包括Lee 4区、Ⅳ级椎间盘退行性改变、合并Ⅰ度腰椎滑脱、合并纤维环破裂,以及髓核区T2值、纤维环区T2值、FA值较低和ADC值较高;同时,髓核区T2值、纤维环区T2值、FA值、ADC值联合预测单侧神经根受压腰椎间盘突出症患者非手术治疗效果的精准度高于单独检测。

Abstract:

Objective To study the relationship between the parameters of diffusion tensor imaging(DTI) of MRI and the pain and the effect of non-surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation with unilateral nerve root compression.Methods Three hundred and sixty-four cases of lumbar disc herniation with unilateral nerve root compression from August 2021 to May 2024 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the degree of nerve root pain, they were divided into the mild pain group(109 cases), the moderate pain group(201 cases) and the severe pain group(54 cases). According to the therapeutic effect, they were divided into the poor outcome group(73 cases) and the good outcome group(291 cases). Multivariate Logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of non-surgical treatment effect in patients with unilateral nerve root compression of lumbar disc herniation, Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between MRI parameters and patients' pain, and receiver operating characteristic curve was used to analyze the predictive value of MRI parameters for patients' non-surgical treatment effect.Results There was no significant difference in the cross-sectional area of psoas major between normal side and compressed side in the mild pain group, the moderate pain group and the severe pain group(P>0.05), but there were significant differences in the cross-sectional area of multifidus muscle on both sides and the T2 value of nucleus pulposus, T2 value of annulus fibrosus, FA value and ADC value of compressed side among the three groups(P<0.05). The VAS score of nerve root pain in patients with unilateral nerve root compression lumbar disc herniation was negatively correlated with T2 value in nucleus pulposus area, T2 value in annulus fibrosus area and FA value, while ADC value was positively correlated with the VAS score of pain. Lee zone 4, degree of intervertebral disc degeneration, combined with grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis, combined with rupture of annulus fibrosus, lower T2 value in nucleus pulposus area, lower T2 value in annulus fibrosus area, lower FA value and higher ADC value were all risk factors for poor non-surgical treatment effect in patients with unilateral nerve root compression of lumbar disc herniation(P<0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the combined area under the curve of T2 value in nucleus pulposus area, T2 value in annulus fibrosus area, FA value and ADC value to predict the non-surgical treatment effect of patients with unilateral nerve root compression lumbar disc herniation was larger than that detected by any of the four methods alone.Conclusion The MRI parameters of lumbar disc herniation patients with unilateral nerve root compression showed changes in T2 value in nucleus pulposus area, T2 value in annulus fibrosus area, FA value and ADC value,and the change level is obviously related to the pain of the nerve root on the compression side. The risk factors of poor non-operative curative effect in this kind of patients include disc degeneration of grade IV in Lee zone 4, combined with lumbar spondylolisthesis of grade I, combined with rupture of annulus fibrosus, lower T2 value in nucleus pulposus area, lower T2 value in annulus fibrosus area, lower FA value and high ADC value. At the same time, the accuracy of combined prediction of T2 value in nucleus pulposus, T2 value in annulus fibrosus, FA value and ADC value for non-surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation with unilateral nerve root compression is higher than that of single detection.

参考文献

[1]Albert HB,Sayari AJ,Barajas JN,et al. The impact of novel inflammation-preserving treatment towards lumbar disc herniation resorption in symptomatic patients:a prospective,multi-imaging and clinical outcomes study[J]. Eur Spine J,2024,33(3):964-973.

[2]Abdel-Fattah AR,Irving A,Baliga S,et al. How to spot the recurring lumbar disc? Risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation(rLDH)in adult patients with lumbar disc prolapse:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Acta Orthop Belg,2023,89(3):381-392.

[3]Lu HB,Wang LS,Li MQ,et al. The association between changes in multifidus muscle morphology and back pain scores following discectomy surgery for lumbar disc herniation:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Spine J,2022,31(7):1784-1794.

[4]王睿,景璟. DTI参数与腰椎间盘突出症关联性及对受压神经诊断情况分析[J].颈腰痛杂志,2021,42(4):582-583.

[5]鲁雪红,马娟,郭辉,等.磁共振弥散张量成像在腰椎间盘突出症神经根受压损伤程度中的诊断效果研究[J].中国医学装备,2022,19(11):93-96.

[6]宋晓飞,高峰,陈达,等.脊髓型颈椎病患者脊髓损伤程度DTI量化分析及颈椎旁肌退行性改变特征评估[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2025,40(7):733-737.

[7]中国康复医学会脊柱脊髓专业委员会基础研究与转化学组.腰椎间盘突出症诊治与康复管理指南[J].中华外科杂志,2022,60(5):401-408.

[8]张陇豫,康晓乐,任敬佩,等.影响腰椎间盘突出症患者经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术治疗效果的相关因素分析[J].中国内镜杂志,2024,30(4):1-6.

[9]Li H,Xiao C,Pan H,et al. Surgical strategy for lumbar disc herniation based on the MSU classification:percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion:a 5-year retrospective study[J]. Orthop Surg,2024,16(8):1963-1973.

[10]Deng C,Feng H,Ma X,et al. Comparing oblique lumbar interbody fusion with lateral screw fixation and percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy(OLIF-PETD)and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF)for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation complicated with lumbar instability[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2022,23(1):1104.

[11]赵红梅,俞璐.基于磁共振成像参数和临床特征分析腰椎间盘突出症经皮椎间孔镜椎间盘切除术疗效的影响因素[J].中国内镜杂志,2024,30(9):78-84.

[12]Wu X,Ma Y,Ding R,et al. Should adjacent asymptomatic lumbar disc herniation be simultaneously rectified? A retrospective cohort study of 371 cases that received an open fusion or endoscopic discectomy only on symptomatic segments[J]. Spine J,2021,21(3):411-417.

[13]董建国,刘广辉.椎板间入路经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗L5~S1腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效及患者术后再手术的危险因素分析[J].颈腰痛杂志,2021,42(3):346-348.

[14]管国义,马乐.腰椎间盘突出症患者CT影像学特征与病情、疗效的关系[J].影像科学与光化学,2022,40(2):403-408.

[15]黄磊,石可松,焦权明,等. G型臂辅助下等离子射频消融术联合臭氧治疗包容型腰椎间盘突出症的临床观察及其复发的影响因素分析[J/CD].中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版),2021,16(3):232-238.

[16]陆建民,杨兴.经椎间孔镜术及显微镜下髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效及影响因素分析[J].中国血液流变学杂志,2022,32(3):400-405.

[17]朱灏,刘波,张华溢,等.经皮椎间孔镜与椎间盘镜髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效及复发影响因素分析[J].河北医学,2021,27(3):429-436.

[18]杜卓姝,倪冬贝,张仑.腰椎间盘突出症患者经改良后路腰椎椎体间融合术治疗疗效及并发症的影响因素[J].河北医学,2021,27(4):556-562.

[19]刘志鹏,李霞,赵海泉,等.磁共振弥散张量成像在PTED术治疗腰椎间盘突出症效果评估中的应用[J].河北医药,2022,44(4):520-523.

[20]冯国洋,郭龙军,王娟,等. MRI参数对腰椎间盘突出症患者椎间盘退变程度的评估价值及与JOA、VAS评分相关性[J].影像科学与光化学,2021,39(2):207-212.

[21]Chen HB,Huang YL,Chen M,et al. Reducing decompression levels by diffusion tensor imaging and conventional magnetic resonance imaging in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis[J]. Br J Neurosurg,2024,38(2):265-271.

[22]杜会玲,刘长坯. MRI影像学在游泳运动员腰椎间盘突出病情评估与疗效评价中的应用[J].影像科学与光化学,2022,40(6):1581-1585.

[23]Altorfer FCS,Tan ET,Sneag DB. Editorial for“clinical value and reliability of quantitative assessments of lumbosacral nerve root using diffusion tensor and diffusion weighted mr imaging:a systematic review”[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2024,60(5):1840-1841.

[24]李霞,刘志鹏,赵海泉,等. PTED术治疗腰椎间盘突出症对患者疼痛和腰椎功能的影响及弥散张量成像的评估价值[J].河北医药,2022,44(15):2292-2295.

[25]Pesesse P,Vanderthommen M,Durieux N,et al. Clinical value and reliability of quantitative assessments of lumbosacral nerve root using diffusion tensor and diffusion weighted mr imaging:a systematic review[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2024,60(5):1823-1839.

[26]李晖,栾海,殷庆龙,等.磁共振DTI技术在判断腰椎间盘突出症责任神经根中的应用价值[J].中国医疗设备,2022,37(11):94-98.

[27]Wei Y,Hu F,Sun S,et al. Feasibility study for evaluating cervical intervertebral disc degeneration using axial diffusion tensor imaging[J]. Eur Spine J,2025,34(2):479-486.

基本信息:

中图分类号:R681.53

引用信息:

[1]杨紫芳,李红,敖仕梅.MRI DTI参数与单侧神经根受压腰椎间盘突出症患者疼痛及非手术治疗效果的关系[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2026,41(03):235-241.

基金信息:

河南省高等学校重点科研项目计划(23A430040)

发布时间:

2026-03-15

出版时间:

2026-03-15

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文